HOME PAGE OF HOUSTON TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER ANDY NOLEN
HOME
EDUCATION AND 15 YEARS CRIMINAL COURTHOUSE EXPERIENCE OF HOUSTON CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY ANDY NOLEN
ATTORNEY
PROFILE
HOUSTON TEXAS CRIMINAL CASE DISMISSALS WON BY HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER ANDY NOLEN
RECENT
CASE
RESULTS
LEGAL SERVICES OFFERED BY THE HOUSTON TEXAS LAW OFFICE OF CRIMINAL LAWYER ANDY NOLEN
SERVICES
LINKS TO CRIMINAL, GOVERNMENT, COURTHOUSE, JAIL, BONDING AND OTHER DEFENSE RELATED WEBSITES.
LINKS
CONTACT THE LAW OFFICE OF CRIMANL DEFENSE LAWYER ANDY NOLEN BY PHONE, EMAIL, YAHOO MESSENGER AND PAYPAL.
CONTACT
THE HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL COURTS OFFICIAL CRIMINAL CHARGE BONDING SCHEDULE
BOND
SCHEDULE
HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL MISDEMEANOR AND FELONY COURTS LOCATIONS AND PHONE NUMBERS
COURT
PHONES &
INFO
ALCOHOL LEVEL TESTER SIMILAR TO A BREATHALYZER USED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES.
ALCOHOL
LEVEL
TESTER
SITEMAP OF HOUSTON CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER ANDY NOLEN
SITE MAP
HOUSTON CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY
OVER 15 YEARS CRIMINAL LAW EXPERIENCE
LICENSED IN BOTH STATE AND FEDERAL COURT
Houston Juvenile DefenseLawyer Andy Nolen has helped juveniles for over 15 years.
Houston
Juvenile
Defense
Harris County Criminal Lawyer Andy Nolen has had over 400 cases dismissed.
Houston
Criminal
Defense
Houston Criminal Lawyer Andy Nolen has over 15 years experience defending drug charges.
Houston
Drug
Defense
Visit our other websites:
DWI / Drunk Driving
Drug Charges
Juvenile Law
Theft Charges
Credit Card Abuse
Assault, Violent Crimes
Probation Violations
Domestic Violence
Occupation Drivers License
Bonding Issues
Any time you are charged with a criminal charge it is a very serious matter.  Many of
my clients over the last 15 years have expressed an interest in resolving their case
as quickly as possible so that they can be finished with it.

That rush to be finished is usually replaced by a new found desire to obtain the best
possible outcome once the long term ramifications of a criminal conviction are
explained.  Long term effects can include a criminal record FOR LIFE, affect your
ability to get a job, obtain credit including denial of a mortgage application, loss of
your Driver's License, surcharges on your License......and the list goes on and on.
713-697-4373
FREE CONSULTATION
Phones Answered 7 Days
Flexible Appointments
15 Years Courthouse
Experience as a
Houston Criminal
Defense Attorney
ANDY NOLEN, ATTORNEY AT LAW
TEXAS DEFENSE LAWYER
Andy Nolen, Houston Criminal Lawyer
Hundreds of Cases Dismissed
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

CHAPTER 18. SEARCH WARRANTS


service provider shall create the copy not later than two business days after the date of the receipt by the service provider of the
subpoena or court order.
(b) The service provider shall immediately notify the authorized peace officer who presented the subpoena or court order
requesting the copy when the copy has been created.
(c) Except as provided by Section 7 of this article, the authorized peace officer shall notify the subscriber or customer whose
communications are the subject of the subpoena or court order of the creation of the copy not later than three days after the
date of the receipt of the notification from the service provider that the copy was created.
(d) The service provider shall release the copy to the requesting authorized peace officer not earlier than the 14th day after the
date of the peace officer's notice to the subscriber or customer if the service provider has not:
(1) initiated proceedings to challenge the request of the peace officer for the copy;  or
(2) received notice from the subscriber or customer that the subscriber or customer has initiated proceedings to challenge the
request.
(e) The service provider may not destroy or permit the destruction of the copy until the information has been delivered to the law
enforcement agency or until the resolution of any court proceedings, including appeals of any proceedings, relating to the
subpoena or court order requesting the creation of the copy, whichever occurs last.
(f) An authorized peace officer who reasonably believes that notification to the subscriber or customer of the subpoena or court
order would result in the destruction of or tampering with information sought may request the creation of a copy of the
information.  The peace officer's belief is not subject to challenge by the subscriber or customer or service provider.
(g)(1) A subscriber or customer who receives notification as described in Subsection (c) of this section may file a written motion to
quash the subpoena or vacate the court order in the court that issued the subpoena or court order not later than the 14th day
after the date of the receipt of the notice.  The motion must contain an affidavit or sworn statement stating that:
(A) the applicant is a subscriber or customer of the service from which the contents of electronic communications stored for the
subscriber or customer have been sought;  and
(B) the applicant's reasons for believing that the information sought is not relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry or
that there has not been substantial compliance with the provisions of this article in some other respect.
(2) The subscriber or customer shall give written notice to the service provider of the challenge to the subpoena or court order.  
The authorized peace officer or law enforcement agency requesting the subpoena or court order shall be served a copy of the
papers filed by personal delivery or by registered or certified mail.
(h)(1) The court shall order the authorized peace officer to file a sworn response to the motion filed by the subscriber or
customer if the court determines that the subscriber or customer has complied with the requirements of Subsection (g) of this
section.  On request of the peace officer, the court may permit the response to be filed in camera.  The court may conduct any
additional proceedings the court considers appropriate if the court is unable to make a determination on the motion on the basis
of the parties' initial allegations and response.
(2) The court shall rule on the motion as soon after the filing of the officer's response as practicable.  The court shall deny the
motion if the court finds that the applicant is not the subscriber or customer whose stored communications are the subject of the
subpoena or court order or that there is reason to believe that the peace officer's inquiry is legitimate and that the
communications sought are relevant to that inquiry.  The court shall quash the subpoena or vacate the order if the court finds
that the applicant is the subscriber or customer whose stored communications are the subject of the subpoena or court order and
that there is not a reason to believe that the communications sought are relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry or that
there has not been substantial compliance with the provisions of this article.
(3) A court order denying a motion or application under this section is not a final order and no interlocutory appeal may be taken
from the denial.
Delay of notification
Sec. 7. (a) An authorized peace officer seeking a court order to obtain information under Section 4(c) of this article may include a
request for an order delaying the notification required under Section 4(c) of this article for a period not to exceed 90 days.  The
court shall grant the request if the court determines that there is reason to believe that notification of the existence of the court
order may have an adverse result, as described in Subsection (c) of this section.
(b) An authorized peace officer who has obtained a subpoena authorized by statute or a grand jury subpoena to seek
information under Section 4(c) of this article may delay the notification required under that section for a period not to exceed 90
days on the execution of a written certification of a supervisory official that there is reason to believe that notification of the
existence of the subpoena may have an adverse result as described in Subsection (c) of this section.  The peace officer shall
maintain a true copy of the certification.
(c) In this section an "adverse result" means:
(1) endangering the life or physical safety of an individual;
(2) flight from prosecution;
(3) destruction of or tampering with evidence;
(4) intimidation of a potential witness;  or
(5) otherwise seriously jeopardizing an investigation or unduly delaying a trial.
(d) A court may grant one or more extensions of the delay of notification provided by this section of up to 90 days on request or
by certification by a supervisory official if the original requirements under Subsection (a) or (b) of this section are met for each
extension.
(e) When the delay of notification under this section expires, the authorized peace officer shall serve, by personal delivery or
registered or certified mail, the subscriber or customer a copy of the process or request together with notice that:
(1) states with reasonable specificity the nature of the law enforcement inquiry;  and
(2) informs the subscriber or customer:
(A) that information stored for the subscriber or customer by the service provider named in the process or request was supplied
to or requested by the peace officer and the date on which the information was supplied or requested;
(B) that notification to the subscriber or customer was delayed;
(C) of the name of the supervisory official who made the certification or the court that granted the request for the delay of
notification;  and
(D) of which provision of this article permitted the delay of notification.
Preclusion of notification
Sec. 8. When an authorized peace officer seeking information under Section 4 of this article is not required to give notice to the
subscriber or customer or is delaying notification under Section 7 of this article, the peace officer may apply to the court for an
order commanding the service provider to whom a warrant, subpoena, or court order is directed not to disclose to any other
person the existence of the warrant, subpoena, or court order.  The order is effective for the period the court considers
appropriate.  The court shall enter the order if the court determines that there is reason to believe that notification of the
existence of the warrant, subpoena, or court order will have an adverse result as described in Section 7(c) of this article.
Reimbursement of costs
Sec. 9. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (c) of this section, an authorized peace officer who obtains information under this
article shall reimburse the person assembling or providing the information for all costs that are reasonably necessary and that
have been directly incurred in searching for, assembling, reproducing, or otherwise providing the information.  These costs
include costs arising from necessary disruption of normal operations of an electronic communications service or remote
computing service in which the information may be stored.
(b) The authorized peace officer and the person providing the information may agree on the amount of reimbursement.  If there
is no agreement, the court that issued the order for production of the information shall determine the amount.  If no court order
was issued for production of the information, the court before which the criminal prosecution relating to the information would be
brought shall determine the amount.
(c) Subsection (a) of this section does not apply to records or other information maintained by a communications common carrier
that relate to telephone toll records or telephone listings obtained under Section 4(e) of this article unless the court determines
that the amount of information required was unusually voluminous or that an undue burden was imposed on the provider.
No cause of action
Sec. 10. A subscriber or customer of a wire or electronic communications or remote computing service does not have a cause of
action against a wire or electronic communications or remote computing service, its officers, employees, agents, or other
specified persons for providing information, facilities, or assistance as required by a court order, warrant, subpoena, or
certification under this article.
Disclosure of stored communications
Sec. 11. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (c) of this section, a provider of an electronic communications service may not
knowingly divulge the contents of a communication that is in electronic storage.
(b) Except as provided by Subsection (c) of this section, a provider of remote computing service may not knowingly divulge the
contents of any communication that is:
(1) in electronic storage;
(2) stored on behalf of a subscriber or customer of the service and is received by means of electronic transmission from or
created by means of computer processing of communications received by means of electronic transmission from the subscriber or
customer;  and
(3) solely for the purpose of providing storage or computer processing services to the subscriber or customer if the provider of
the service is not authorized to obtain access to the contents of those communications for purposes of providing any service
other than storage or computer processing.
(c) A provider of an electronic communications or remote computing service may divulge the contents of an electronically stored
communication:
(1) to an intended recipient of the communication or that person's agent;
(2) to the addressee or that person's agent;
(3) with the consent of the originator, to the addressee or the intended recipient of the communication, or the subscriber of a
remote computing service;
(4) to a person whose facilities are used to transmit the communication to its destination or the person's employee or authorized
representative;
(5) as may be necessary to provide the service or to protect the property or rights of the provider of the service;
(6) to a law enforcement agency if the contents were obtained inadvertently by the service provider and the contents appear to
pertain to the commission of a crime;  or
(7) as authorized under federal or other state law.
Cause of action
Sec. 12. (a) Except as provided by Section 10 of this article, a provider of electronic communications service or subscriber or
customer of an electronic communications service aggrieved by a violation of this article has a civil cause of action if the conduct
constituting the violation was committed knowingly or intentionally and is entitled to:
(1) injunctive relief;
(2) a reasonable attorney's fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred;  and
(3) the sum of the actual damages suffered and any profits made by the violator as a result of the violation or $1,000, whichever
is more.
(b) The reliance in good faith on a court order, warrant, subpoena, or legislative authorization is a complete defense to any civil
action brought under this article.
(c) A civil action under this section may be presented within two years after the date the claimant first
!5 years Courtroom Experience And Over 400 Hundred Cases Dismissed Places Houston Criminal Defense Attorney Andy Nolen Amongst the Best Criminal Lawyers in Houston and Harris County, Texas.