The Houston, Texas, criminal defense law firm of Attorney Andy Nolen,  represents people who have been accused of a state crime in Texas, including in
communities such as League City, Angleton, Pearland, Alvin, Clear Lake, Sugar Land, The Woodlands, Baytown, Pasadena, Memorial, Spring Branch, River
Oaks, West University, and Bellaire. Counties that this firm serves include: Galveston County • Fort Bend County • Montgomery County • Brazoria County •
Harris County.  Cases handled include: Domestic Violence, Theft, Shoplifting, Drunk Driving, Evading Arrest
HOUSTON CRIMINAL LAWYER
OVER 15 YEARS CRIMINAL LAW EXPERIENCE
LICENSED IN BOTH STATE AND FEDERAL COURT
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 1
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 2
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 3
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 4
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 5
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 6
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 7
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 8
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 9
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 10
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 11
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 12
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 13
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 14
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 15
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 16
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 17
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 17a
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 18 1
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 18 2
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 18 3
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 18  4
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 18  5
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 18  6
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 18  7
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 18 8
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 18 9
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 18  10
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 18  11
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 19
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 20
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 21
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 22]
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 23
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 24
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 25
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 26 1
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 26  2
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 26  3
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 27
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 28
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 29
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 30
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 31
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 32
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 32a
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 33
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 34
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 35 - 1
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 35 - 2
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 36 - 1
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 36 - 2
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 37 - 1
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 37 - 2
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 37 - 3
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 38 - 1
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 38 - 2
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 38 - 3
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 38 - 4
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 39
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 40
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 42-1
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 42-2
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 42-3
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 42-4
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 42-5
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 42-6
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 42-7
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 42-8
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 42-9
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 42-10
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 43-1l
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 43-2
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 44-1
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 44-2
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 45-1
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 45-2
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 45-3
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 45 - 4
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 45-5
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 45-6
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 46
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 46a
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 46b-1
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 46b-2
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 46b-3
Code of Criminal Procedure Ch 46b-4
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 37. THE VERDICT

Art. 37.01. VERDICT.  A "verdict" is a written declaration by a jury of its decision of
the issue submitted to it in the case.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., vol. 2, p. 317, ch. 722.
Art. 37.02. VERDICT BY NINE JURORS.  In misdemeanor cases in the district court,
where one or more jurors have been discharged from serving after the cause has
been submitted to them, if all the alternate jurors selected under Article 33.011 of
this code have either been seated or discharged, and there be as many as nine of
the jurors remaining, those remaining may render and return a verdict;  but in
such case, the verdict must be signed by each juror rendering it.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., vol. 2, p. 317, ch. 722.
Amended by Acts 1983, 68th Leg., p. 4594, ch. 775, Sec. 4, eff. Aug. 29, 1983.
Art. 37.03. IN COUNTY COURT.  In the county court the verdict must be concurred
in by each juror.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., vol. 2, p. 317, ch. 722.
Art. 37.04. WHEN JURY HAS AGREED.  When the jury agrees upon a verdict, it shall
be brought into court by the proper officer;  and if it states that it has agreed, the
verdict shall be read aloud by the judge, the foreman, or the clerk.  If in proper
form and no juror dissents therefrom, and neither party requests a poll of the jury,
the verdict shall be entered upon the minutes of the court.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., vol. 2, p. 317, ch. 722.  Amended by Acts 1981, 67th Leg.,
p. 171, ch. 78, Sec. 1, eff. April 30, 1981.
Art. 37.05. POLLING THE JURY.  The State or the defendant shall have the right to
have the jury polled, which is done by calling separately the name of each juror
and asking him if the verdict is his.  If all, when asked, answer in the affirmative,
the verdict shall be entered upon the minutes;  but if any juror answer in the
negative, the jury shall retire again to consider its verdict.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., vol. 2, p. 317, ch. 722.
Art. 37.06. PRESENCE OF DEFENDANT.  In felony cases the defendant must be
present when the verdict is read unless his absence is wilful or voluntary.  A verdict
in a misdemeanor case may be received and read in the absence of the defendant.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., vol. 2, p. 317, ch. 722.
Art. 37.07. VERDICT MUST BE GENERAL;  SEPARATE HEARING ON PROPER
PUNISHMENT.
Sec. 1. (a) The verdict in every criminal action must be general.  When there are
special pleas on which a jury is to find they must say in their verdict that the
allegations in such pleas are true or untrue.
(b) If the plea is not guilty, they must find that the defendant is either guilty or
not guilty, and, except as provided in Section 2, they shall assess the punishment
in all cases where the same is not absolutely fixed by law to some particular
penalty.
(c) If the charging instrument contains more than one count or if two or more
offenses are consolidated for trial pursuant to Chapter 3 of the Penal Code, the
jury shall be instructed to return a finding of guilty or not guilty in a separate
verdict as to each count and offense submitted to them.
Sec. 2.  (a)  In all criminal cases, other than misdemeanor cases of which the
justice court or municipal court has jurisdiction, which are tried before a jury on a
plea of not guilty, the judge shall, before argument begins, first submit to the jury
the issue of guilt or innocence of the defendant of the offense or offenses
charged, without authorizing the jury to pass upon the punishment to be imposed.  
If the jury fails to agree on the issue of guilt or innocence, the judge shall declare
a mistrial and discharge the jury, and jeopardy does not attach in the case.
(b)  Except as provided by Article 37.071 or 37.072, if a finding of guilty is
returned, it shall then be the responsibility of the judge to assess the punishment
applicable to the offense; provided, however, that (1) in any criminal action where
the jury may recommend community supervision and the defendant filed his sworn
motion for community supervision before the trial began, and (2) in other cases
where the defendant so elects in writing before the commencement of the voir dire
examination of the jury panel, the punishment shall be assessed by the same
jury, except as provided in Section 3(c) of this article and in Article 44.29.  If a
finding of guilty is returned, the defendant may, with the consent of the attorney
for the state, change his election of one who assesses the punishment.
(c) Punishment shall be assessed on each count on which a finding of guilty has
been returned.
Sec. 3. Evidence of prior criminal record in all criminal cases after a finding of guilty.
(a)(1) Regardless of the plea and whether the punishment be assessed by the
judge or the jury, evidence may be offered by the state and the defendant as to
any matter the court deems relevant to sentencing, including but not limited to the
prior criminal record of the defendant, his general reputation, his character, an
opinion regarding his character, the circumstances of the offense for which he is
being tried, and, notwithstanding Rules 404 and 405, Texas Rules of Evidence, any
other evidence of an extraneous crime or bad act that is shown beyond a
reasonable doubt by evidence to have been committed by the defendant or for
which he could be held criminally responsible, regardless of whether he has
previously been charged with or finally convicted of the crime or act.  A court may
consider as a factor in mitigating punishment the conduct of a defendant while
participating in a program under Chapter 17 as a condition of release on bail.  
Additionally, notwithstanding Rule 609(d), Texas Rules of Evidence, and subject to
Subsection (h), evidence may be offered by the state and the defendant of an
adjudication of delinquency based on a violation by the defendant of a penal law
of the grade of:
(A) a felony;  or
(B) a misdemeanor punishable by confinement in jail.
(2) Notwithstanding Subdivision (1), evidence may not be offered by the state to
establish that the race or ethnicity of the defendant makes it likely that the
defendant will engage in future criminal conduct.
(b) After the introduction of such evidence has been concluded, and if the jury has
the responsibility of assessing the punishment, the court shall give such additional
written instructions as may be necessary and the order of procedure and the rules
governing the conduct of the trial shall be the same as are applicable on the issue
of guilt or innocence.
(c)  If the jury finds the defendant guilty and the matter of punishment is referred
to the jury, the verdict shall not be complete until a jury verdict has been rendered
on both the guilt or innocence of the defendant and the amount of punishment.  
In the event the jury shall fail to agree on the issue of punishment, a mistrial shall
be declared only in the punishment phase of the trial, the jury shall be discharged,
and no jeopardy shall attach.  The court shall impanel another jury as soon as
practicable to determine the issue of punishment.
(d) When the judge assesses the punishment, he may order an investigative
report as contemplated in Section 9 of Article 42.12 of this code and after
considering the report, and after the hearing of the evidence hereinabove provided
for, he shall forthwith announce his decision in open court as to the punishment to
be assessed.
(e) Nothing herein contained shall be construed as affecting the admissibility of
extraneous offenses on the question of guilt or innocence.
(f) In cases in which the matter of punishment is referred to a jury, either party
may offer into evidence the availability of community corrections facilities serving
the jurisdiction in which the offense was committed.
(g)  On timely request of the defendant, notice of intent to introduce evidence
under this article shall be given in the same manner required by Rule 404(b),
Texas Rules of Evidence.  If the attorney representing the state intends to
introduce an extraneous crime or bad act that has not resulted in a final conviction
in a court of record or a probated or suspended sentence, notice of that intent is
reasonable only if the notice includes the date on which and the county in which the
alleged crime or bad act occurred and the name of the alleged victim of the crime
or bad act.  The requirement under this subsection that the attorney representing
the state give notice applies only if the defendant makes a timely request to the
attorney representing the state for the notice.
(h) Regardless of whether the punishment will be assessed by the judge or the
jury, neither the state nor the defendant may offer before sentencing evidence
that the defendant plans to undergo an orchiectomy.
(i) Evidence of an adjudication for conduct that is a violation of a penal law of the
grade of misdemeanor punishable by confinement in jail is admissible only if the
conduct upon which the adjudication is based occurred on or after January 1, 1996.
Sec. 4.  (a)  In the penalty phase of the trial of a felony case in which the
punishment is to be assessed by the jury rather than the court, if the offense of
which the jury has found the defendant guilty is listed in Section 3g(a)(1), Article
42.12, of this code or if the judgment contains an affirmative finding under Section
3g(a)(2), Article 42.12, of this code, unless the defendant has been convicted of
an offense under Section 21.02, Penal Code, an offense under Section 22.021,
Penal Code, that is punishable under Subsection (f) of that section, or a capital
felony, the court shall charge the jury in writing as follows:
"Under the law applicable in this case, the defendant, if sentenced to a term of
imprisonment, may earn time off the period of incarceration imposed through the
award of good conduct time.  Prison authorities may award good conduct time to a
prisoner who exhibits good behavior, diligence in carrying out prison work
assignments, and attempts at rehabilitation.  If a prisoner engages in misconduct,
prison authorities may also take away all or part of any good conduct time earned
by the prisoner.
"It is also possible that the length of time for which the defendant will be
imprisoned might be reduced by the award of parole.
"Under the law applicable in this case, if the defendant is sentenced to a term of
imprisonment, he will not become eligible for parole until the actual time served
equals one-half of the sentence imposed or 30 years, whichever is less, without
consideration of any good conduct time he may earn.  If the defendant is
sentenced to a term of less than four years, he must serve at least two years
before he is eligible for parole.  Eligibility for parole does not guarantee that parole
will be granted.
"It cannot accurately be predicted how the parole law and good conduct time might
be applied to this defendant if he is sentenced to a term of imprisonment,
because the application of these laws will depend on decisions made by prison and
parole authorities.
"You may consider the existence of the parole law and good conduct time.  
However, you are not to consider the extent to which good conduct time may be
awarded to or forfeited by this particular defendant.  You are not to consider the
manner in which the parole law may be applied to this particular defendant."
(b)  In the penalty phase of the trial of a felony case in which the punishment is to
be assessed by the jury rather than the court, if the offense is punishable as a
felony of the first degree, if a prior conviction has been alleged for enhancement
of punishment as provided by Section 12.42(b), (c)(1) or (2), or (d), Penal Code,
or if the offense is a felony not designated as a capital felony or a felony of the
first, second, or third degree and the maximum term of imprisonment that may be
imposed for the offense is longer than 60 years, unless the offense of which the
jury has found the defendant guilty is an offense that is punishable under Section
21.02(h), Penal Code, or is listed in Section 3g(a)(1), Article 42.12, of this code or
the judgment contains an affirmative finding under Section 3g(a)(2), Article 42.12,
of this code, the court shall charge the jury in writing as follows:
"Under the law applicable in this case, the defendant, if sentenced to a term of
imprisonment, may earn time off the period of incarceration imposed through the
award of good conduct time.  Prison authorities may award good conduct time to a
prisoner who exhibits good behavior, diligence in carrying out prison work
assignments, and attempts at rehabilitation.  If a prisoner engages in misconduct,
prison authorities may also take away all or part of any good conduct time earned
by the prisoner.
"It is also possible that the length of time for which the defendant will be
imprisoned might be reduced by the award of parole.
"Under the law applicable in this case, if the defendant is sentenced to a term of
imprisonment, he will not become eligible for parole until the actual time served
plus any good conduct time earned equals one-fourth of the sentence imposed or
15 years, whichever is less.  Eligibility for parole does not guarantee that parole will
be granted.
"It cannot accurately be predicted how the parole law and good conduct time might
be applied to this defendant if he is sentenced to a term of imprisonment,
because the application of these laws will depend on decisions made by prison and
parole authorities.
"You may consider the existence of the parole law and good conduct time.  
However, you are not to consider the extent to which good conduct time may be
awarded to or forfeited by this particular defendant.  You are not to consider the
manner in which the parole law may be applied to this particular defendant."
(c) In the penalty phase of the trial of a felony case in which the punishment is to
be assessed by the jury rather than the court, if the offense is punishable as a
felony of the second or third degree, if a prior conviction has been alleged for
enhancement as provided by Section 12.42(a), Penal Code, or if the offense is a
felony not designated as a capital felony or a felony of the first, second, or third
degree and the maximum term of imprisonment that may be imposed for the
offense is 60 years or less, unless the offense of which the jury has found the
defendant guilty is listed in Section 3g(a)(1), Article 42.12, of this code or the
judgment contains an affirmative finding under Section 3g(a)(2), Article 42.12, of
this code, the court shall charge the jury in writing as follows:
"Under the law applicable in this case, the defendant, if sentenced to a term of
imprisonment, may earn time off the period of incarceration imposed through the
award of good conduct time.  Prison authorities may award good conduct time to a
prisoner who exhibits good behavior, diligence in carrying out prison work
assignments, and attempts at rehabilitation.  If a prisoner engages in misconduct,
prison authorities may also take away all or part of any good conduct time earned
by the prisoner.
"It is also possible that the length of time for which the
Our law firm has
handled thousands of
criminal cases with
many hundreds being
totally
dismissed,
criminal charges dealt
with include amongst
others Juvenile Law,
Family Violence,
Assault, Drug
Charges, Theft,
Shoplifting,
Possession of
Marijuana, Felonies,
Misdemeanors,  
Failure to Stop and
Give Information,
Reckless Driving,
Possession of a
Controlled Substance,
Possession of
Cocaine, Motions to
Revoke Probation or
Deferred Adjudication,
Burglary of a Building
or Habitation,
Runaway, Truancy,
Vandalism.  We have
helped thousands of
people get their
cases dismisses,
reduced, or kept off
their records and we
can help you.  Please
call today  
713-697-4373
Criminal Attorney Site Map
Attorney Profile
Recent Harris County Court Cases
Criminal Defense Services at the Law Office of Andy Nolen
The Best Criminal Resource Links
Contact Information for the Law Office of Attorney Andy Nolen
Harris County Criminal Courts Bonding Schedule
Simulation Intoxilyzer Breath Test
Harris County Criminal Courts Phone Numbers
Houston Criminal Lawyer Andy Nolen
Houston Criminal Defense Lawyer Andy Nolen has over 15 years courtroom experience.
Custom Search